lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
He Who Drowned the World

4/5. Sequel to She Who Became the Sun, concluding this duology about the girl who dresses as a man – becomes a man, in most ways – to found the Ming dynasty.

Woof, this is a ride. I kept thinking, in mingled admiration and confusion, I don’t like this sort of thing, why do I like this so much? This is a violent, lurid, tragic seething psychosexual drama. Emphasis on the psychosexual. And the drama. And – well, really all of it. None of those are big draws for me.

But the thing is, there is a deftness, a depth to the way these books peer into unfittingness, and a complexity they afford themselves by way of having all of the central players be variously engaged in defying/escaping/suffering/manipulating/enduring/subverting/destroying their gender and sexuality. None of their modes of being would be particularly notable by themselves, but together they illuminate. Bloodily. Furiously.

Content notes: Um. A lot of death in horrible ways. Masochism. Homophobia and cisism. Domestic violence. Some complicated consent stuff.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
She Who Became the Sun by Shelley Parker-Chan

4/5. Revisionist tale of the founding of the Ming Dynasty with mild fantasy elements. Revisionist in that our hero – hm. Our protagonist is a nameless peasant girl who assumes her dead brother's identity and steps into his foretold fate of greatness.

This is as good as everyone says it is. I will say that if your gender feelings are like my gender feelings (i.e., that's my gender assignment? Cool, I'm into it) then you may, like me, not find this as electrifying as people with more complex gender feelings do. But I enjoyed the heck out of this regardless (adventure! Politics! Plotting! Hot queer romance!). I will also say that one thing I appreciate about this book and its queerness, gender and otherwise, is that it rejects dualities in all forms. The problem with having a book with one genderqueer person in it is that person becomes the genderqueer avatar. The problem with having two is that they become a duality. This book rolls with two (at least two central ones), and though the ways they exist within their nonconforming bodies while in positions of power over mostly men are contrasted, and the paths they walk to meet their fates are markedly different, the book isn't interested in deciding whose doing it better or more right or what have you. These two are alike in many ways – in having parts of their nonconforming identities forged in violence and loss, for one – and though the book in many respects revolves around the pivot point of their complicated enemy/ally dynamic, the two of them exist to comment upon their circumstances as much as on each other.

Btw, I found this spoilery commentary on relevant linguistic and cultural aspects helpful.

Content notes: Famine, war, various flavors of brutality and death, most in reference.

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78910
1112131415 1617
181920 21222324
2526 27 2829 3031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 04:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios