Villain by Natalie Zina Walschots
Jul. 28th, 2026 01:31 pmVillain
4/5. Sequel to Hench. More supervillain monsterfucking bisexual maelstrom (IYKYK).
It took five plus years for this sequel to come out, which the author says is because she completely rewrote it multiple times. I have a guess that she was rewriting as part of the process of deciding how hard to go. She goes pretty hard, in the end. Not so much on the monsterfucking itself, but on the implications of becoming involved with a supervillain who thinks surveillance is a form of affection. This book lives a lot in some deeply uncomfortable spaces, very much on purpose. This is not a romantasy, and one comp I saw to such is absolutely unhinged.
Oh I mean she also goes pretty hard on the villainy, but you know, good for her. My wife and I were discussing this book in front of our six-year-old, which triggered a conversation with him in which he had a hard time grasping how the villain can be the main character of a book. This is a really interesting example of that; it is doing the usual thing of showing her reasons, all of which make sense, but it’s not particularly interested in justifying anything. She’s a villain. She does terrible things. The book has bigger fish to fry.
Content notes: The book has a good thorough note up front, actually.
4/5. Sequel to Hench. More supervillain monsterfucking bisexual maelstrom (IYKYK).
It took five plus years for this sequel to come out, which the author says is because she completely rewrote it multiple times. I have a guess that she was rewriting as part of the process of deciding how hard to go. She goes pretty hard, in the end. Not so much on the monsterfucking itself, but on the implications of becoming involved with a supervillain who thinks surveillance is a form of affection. This book lives a lot in some deeply uncomfortable spaces, very much on purpose. This is not a romantasy, and one comp I saw to such is absolutely unhinged.
Oh I mean she also goes pretty hard on the villainy, but you know, good for her. My wife and I were discussing this book in front of our six-year-old, which triggered a conversation with him in which he had a hard time grasping how the villain can be the main character of a book. This is a really interesting example of that; it is doing the usual thing of showing her reasons, all of which make sense, but it’s not particularly interested in justifying anything. She’s a villain. She does terrible things. The book has bigger fish to fry.
Content notes: The book has a good thorough note up front, actually.