lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
Deadline (Newsflesh Trilogy, #2)Deadline by Mira Grant

My rating: 2 of 5 stars


DNF at 70%, though I went and spoiled myself when I realized just how little I care. And nope. Don't care.

It's interesting how polarizing Mira Grant/Seanan Mcguire is. The people who love her looooove her, and the people who don't are utterly baffled at all the fuss over such terribly written tripe. I've been on both sides of this: I have friends who speak in trembling, delighted voices of the Toby Day books, whereas I thought they were so poorly written as to irritate my brain like nails on a chalkboard. Then again, I genuinely enjoyed Feed, even though it had all the same leaden character work and thudding prose. So I wondered . . . which was the fluke?

Yeah. It was the book I liked. This one, without the political foreground designed to appeal to me, and without the emotional climax? *whistles between teeth*. All you've got left is writing that I find irritating to a really extraordinary degree. I mean, I read original M/M! I know from bad writing, and have excellent mental muscles for tuning it out! But there is just something to her writing that is unignorably bad, and reading it makes my brainstem hurt.

Maybe it's the endless, endless repetition of detail. I would put down solid money that, at some point, someone really impressed Grant with this idea that to build convincing characters, what you do is choose some distinguishing characteristic and emphasize it. So she was like, I know! I'll make these people drink Coke! That's character-building!

And I wander off with a terrible headache, muttering about how brand association isn't the same thing as characterization, and also oh my God please please stop with the Coke we know stop stop stop.

Or maybe it's how her world building is not done through variation and elaboration, but repetition. Characters in this book take repeated blood tests to assess zombie infection status. Every step of this process is described in such precise and identical detail, over and over and over again, that at one point I started reciting the paragraph along with my audiobook narrator, and I had most of the words right. That's not world building, kids. That's bad writing.

These are just guesses. Neither of those things alone could account for my near allergic reaction to her prose. It's just. Nails on a chalkboard. In my soul.

I dunno, maybe she'll happen to drop another book right on my buttons some day. She seems to publish something every ten minutes, so it's possible. I just don't see why I should bother irritating myself trying to find it.




View all my reviews
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
Feed (Newsflesh, #1)Feed by Mira Grant

My rating: 4 of 5 stars


The one about the bloggers embedded in a presidential campaign in post-zombie apocalypse America of 2040. It’s going to take me a bit to get to the punchline here, so bear with me.



This book had the misfortune of spending its research budget on things I don’t know much about – virology and disease containment science – and none on things I know a shit ton about – presidential campaigns, politics in general, and political blogging in particular. And by “research budget” I mean ‘bandwidth Mira Grant dedicated to good world building.’ The zombie virus stuff looked shiny keen, but I was too distracted by going, ‘presidential campaigns don’t work like that. No, really, not even when there are zombies.’ I will show enormous and uncharacteristic restraint and not explain everything that was slapdash or illogical or nonsensical or just flat out incorrect about the politics in this book, because we’d be here all day. And also, I have been informed that not everybody cares about this stuff. I don’t always believe it, because I’m with the narrator of this book, who said, “There are moments when I look at the world I’m living in, all the cut-throat politics and the incredibly petty partisan deal-mongering, and I wonder how anyone could be happy doing anything else.” Yeah. It’s like that for me.



But restraint! I sometimes have it. So anyway, politics was a bust, and the blogging was a little shaky. Just the most obvious thing – you can’t have your characters explain how they’re the first bloggers to be embedded in a presidential campaign in 2040 when it has already happened when your book goes to press in 2010. And more fundamentally, there is something disingenuous about both author and characters using a lot of this ‘blogs are where the truth is, the little guy on the internet has integrity that the print media doesn’t’ shpeel when the bloggers in the book (government-licensed, by the way) are all but indistinguishable from traditional media outlets, like some of the wire services. With the exception that it’s actually much more obvious where the money for the traditional media is coming from. And don’t get me started on this print media versus blogging culture clash she has going on – I haven’t heard people trotting out a lot of this stuff since the Howard Dean campaign. That was back in 2004, for anyone not keeping track.



Aaanyway. I say all this first because it’s stuff that did bug me about the book. But secondly to make the point that when I say this book got me, I mean it had to work at it. And it got me but good. It is frustrating and tense and scary, and sweet, and wrenchingly sad. It’s one of those stories about the little guy on the internet fighting back that work on me even though they always trip my cynicism circuit. I was totally wrung out when I was done reading it, with that physical ache you get when it feels like you’ve cried hard, even though you haven’t.



So yeah, definitely a recommendation. I’m just frustrated because the book was pretty good, but there were a solid dozen ways it wasn’t brilliant, and it really, really could have been.



(Disability tag for protagonist's retinal condition and chronic pain, handled in subtle and interesting and totally believable ways).



View all my reviews

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 04:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios