lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
The Tomb of Dragons

4/5. Third book in this series about a – call him a cleric, I guess -- who can speak to the dead.

This series continues to grow on me. Our protagonist is deeply wounded before we ever meet him, and his glacial progress is not so much towards healing as simply acknowledging the pain he is in. These books resist catharsis almost entirely, which I appreciate. Also recommended if you enjoy the trope of ‘rather darling protagonist does not know he is darling, goes around being confused when people like him.’

I do continue to be confused by many of her pacing choices. These books are often of the ‘and then the thing, and then the other thing’ style where there aren’t A and B plots so much as six largely unrelated things rattling around at the same time. I am fine with this until I’m not. See me going oh, come on! when we had a side quest at 95% of the way into this book.

On the plus, Maia cameo! If you know you know.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
The Grief of Stones

3+/5. Sequel to Witness for the Dead. Our protagonist continues investigating small and large mysteries in his fantasy city, acquires an apprentice, and might even have an emotion.

Consider this an exercise in subjectivity. I thought the prequel was fine, but complained about how the protagonist was so emotionally locked down that he seemed to barely exist at times, and how there was only the most microscopic change to that, and it wasn’t satisfying. I picked this book up out of a sense of completionism, but at least in part expecting to wash my hands of the series.

And actually? This book is very similar to the first, except it landed much better this time. Granted, our protagonist is beginning to, in the tiniest ways, engage in his community, and he might even acknowledge that he has feelings once in a while, so there is an arc here. It’s just an incredibly slow one – there’s a point where something spiritually violent happens to him, and he is so incapable of talking about his own pain that what he says of it is brief and oblique to the point of throwing me out of the book in confusion about WTF had actually happened. So there’s still a lot of that. But I actually believe now that she’s going somewhere with this.

But it’s still quite a similar book, to be fair, and this time I liked it more. That’s how it is sometimes.

Content notes: All sorts of death and loss via the mysteries, including stillbirth, murder, suicide, betrayal, maternal mortality. Also sexual exploitation of minors.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
Witness for the Dead

3/5. Offshoot of the widely beloved The Goblin Emperor, featuring a minor character from that book off in a distant city going about his business speaking to the newly dead and, consequently, solving a series of mysteries.

Pleasant but restrained. Our narrator is suffering – grief and old pain and guilt and related self-doubt – but he doesn't want to tell us about it, so much of this book occurs by way of mystery solving in the foreground and a rather sparse background in which blips of feeling occasionally fuzz like static. A lot of people have said that this book does not resemble Goblin Emperor; it doesn't, except in that they are both about people who have been hurt to the point where they can no longer value themselves, but how there are some fundamentally good people around them who can do the valuing for them. That can be a satisfying story, and this one mostly is, but it doesn't go anywhere near the emotional places that Goblin Emperor does – our narrator has a sort of abortive crisis in his way, but he remains fundamentally very solitary and within himself and his pain, even as he makes incremental steps towards having a community.

So I enjoyed it, but the interpersonal story didn't knock my socks off, and, well. She's just not that good at mysteries? I mean, they're perfectly competent, but there's nothing particularly creative or interesting about them, so they don't sustain the book for me.

Content notes: Death, serial murder, ghouls and associated horror.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
The Angel of the Crows

3/5. Genderqueer Sherlock historical wingfic, subgenre angels, that eventually becomes Holmes canon wingfic, subgenre angels, also werewolves, vampires, hellhounds, and Jack-the-Ripper.

I care very little for Holmes-related everything, but did enjoy this to a point. That point comes when I start asking okay….but why does this cost $28 while nearly everyone else is posting theirs for free on the AO3? It should not be a surprise to anyone that there are multiple kinds of privilege at work in who gets to sell their fanfiction and who doesn't. AT least it’s a woman who gets to do it this time, which makes a nice change. And it's not like – hm. I always twitch a bit through these arguments, because it's not like getting paid is the same as selling out, and it's not like there's some automatic virtue in participating in the fanfic gift community, but it's hard to have these conversations about who gets paid without assigning a lot of moral valence to one path or another. (And don't even get me started on the tumblr contingent who think all art should be free always and being charged ever for anything they enjoy is class warfare. Lol okay, child, you institute a system where no artists get paid and then we can talk about class warfare).

But . . . I'm trying to put my finger on something here. There is something about the wall-to-wall indulgence of this book, how it is clearly stuffed full of all the loosely-related things the author likes at the expense of things like a through line and pacing, which makes it feel particularly like fanfic even when it isn't lifting scenes wholesale from Sherlock. And even when it isn't lifting scenes wholesale and is off sort of doing its own thing – which it does, a bit, with the Sherlock character in particular – it has a density of reference that goes past charming into something else. Like the almost entirely offscreen character named for a Sayers character. And there's something about the fanfictionness of this whole thing and the fact that it is for sale that turns the density of references from charming into . . . cliquish? More like in-jokes than easter eggs. A thing that keeps people out rather than a thing that invites them further in, because it costs $28. IDK.

So does this totally belong on the AO3? Yep. Does the author deserve to get paid for it? Sure. Do I have complicated feelings about the intersection of those facts? Yeah.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
The Goblin Emperor

4/5. Refreshingly anti-grimdark tale of the abused and neglected eighteen-year-old half-Goblin child of the Elf emperor elevated unexpectedly to the throne after his father and brothers are killed.

I have a huuuuuge loyalty kink (you guys didn't know that, didya? Didya? …You totally did). This one doubles down by combining loyalty with fealty, and hitting that sweet sweet spot of someone earning all of it.

This is a surprisingly gentle book about a boy determined to do better than he was done by; in which most people can be counted on to have redeeming qualities underneath; where providence is kind as much as cruel. I think one of the things I like best is that this is a book very much focused on forgiveness, but it doesn't short shrift anger. That is rare – stories of forgiveness like to treat anger as a brief, passing phase, something that the "good person" must put aside as quickly as possible. And I mean, I'm sure it's a total coincidence that 'turn the other cheek' is precisely the standard you hold people to if you want to ensure that abusers can always keep abusing, yep yep. This book believes in anger, and knows it lingers, and that anger and forgiveness aren't mutually exclusive, because it just isn't that simple.

A kind book, but not as simple as it pretends.

Things worth knowing: Katherine Addison is the pseud of Sarah Monette (not in any way a secret – I generally try not to publicly connect names authors don't want connected, but she clearly doesn't care). Also, there is apparently an invaluable naming conventions guide (in the back?) of the print edition which is not included with the audiobook. Why, Tantor Media, why? It actively pisses me off when production companies slice off so much metadata and front and back matter for audio, and in this instance I think it does the book very particular harm.

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 12:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios