The Scarlet Pimpernel by Emmuska Orczy
Apr. 25th, 2012 10:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

My rating: 1 of 5 stars
So boring. So boring;.
I read this weeks ago, and I've been waiting ever since for someone else in the group to come out with a great review. Something transformative. It would compare this to Radcliff and nineteenth-century opera and talk about modes of romanticism. Or it'd be one of those intensely personal reviews about a grimey, sweaty summer spent singing in the chorus line for a production of Pimpernel, and the backstage affair whose passions ebbed in counterpoint to the story. Or, I don't know, something.
*crickets*
It's not like I got anything either. Except maybe one thing.
Of all the times in recent years for this book to hit my radar screen, this is probably the worst. It's not about rescuing people from the violence of the French Revolution. It's about those poor, persecuted rich people. It's horrible, they've never hurt anybody -- well, except for the starvation, and the institutionalized remnants of feudal pseudo-slavery, and the "I'm not concerned about the very poor" -- oh sorry, wrong guy. "let them eat cake." There. That's the one. This is a book convinced that people are interesting and worthy of respect by virtue of being very wealthy, and I just.
It's a small part of my job to absorb national political mood and reflect it back in different analytical modes. And I was not in the fucking mood for "let them eat cake."
View all my reviews
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:26 am (UTC)I'd expect that without Sills it would be rather terrible, sort of like Wildhorn's earlier Jekyll and Hyde, which I saw the video of with David Hasselhoff. No, really. It was soooo bad I laughed through the whole thing.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:43 am (UTC)*sporfles violently*