Date: 2007-10-27 02:50 am (UTC)
No, not really.

No because the main argument of the book is that there comes a point of thoughtless, grinding, ineffective dutifulness that becomes tunnel visioned, and at that point keeping at the duty isn't duty, it's just stupid. And actually, by then, part of what you can't see anymore is that the duty may have changed and grown and you've been going at it all wrong. See the excerpt I quoted above. Which I agree with, more or less.

Not really because she didn't actually sell me on that in this book. I got maybe 1/3 of the way there, and I could see the channels where my thoughts ought to have been running, but they just weren't when Dag made his choice.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
151617181920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 11:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios