Feb. 21st, 2022

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
Iron Widow

3/5. In far future fantasy/scifi inspired by Chinese history, a young woman enlists, knowing it will mean her death at the hands of her male co-pilot, for the purpose of killing the pilot who murdered her sister.

Like most YA these days, this one has a lot going on, including: mecha vs. alien fights, a love triangle turned poly triad, a deeply unjust and misogynist society that makes our heroine incoherently furious, family drama, celebrity culture, chronic pain, tormented boys and nice boys, and a whole lot of plot twists.

It has enjoyable elements – the heroine's fury is deep and genuine and unrelenting, which I appreciate, and while I have no investment in the triad emotionally, I like that it exists. But overall, the YA is too strong in this one for me. Am I the only one who thinks YA has been getting less and less interesting for the past decade? Which makes me sad, because there's a lot of cultural and sexual diversity in YA these days, and I'd like to enjoy it more. But it's all so *gestures* pitched at an emotional eleven at all times, with paper thin worldbuilding. Now I'm trying to remember if Hunger Games really was that much better, or if it's just that we've all read too much of this now.

Content notes: Violence of many sorts, misogyny, footbinding, forced addiction, torture.
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
Fight of the Century Eds. Michael Chabon and Ayelet Waldman

3/5. A fundraising book, the overwhelming evidence suggests, and a star-studded one. Forty authors each wrote a short essay on a particular case, with wildly varying quality. Jacqueline Woodson, for one, took my breath away, while I'm still not sure WTF Neil Gaiman thought he was contributing here. And I have now developed a strong dislike for Brenda J. Child, who I'd never heard of before, based on her discussion of Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, which is one of those essays whose principles I agree with, but where the author is so smug and blinkered about those principles that she does things like assuming only the people on her side are actual human beings. That's a particularly egregious way of thinking in respect to that case, of all cases.

Anyway, probably a good book for the civil rights history or legal history enthusiast.

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78910
1112131415 1617
181920 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 21st, 2025 11:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios