Date: 2014-01-18 10:49 am (UTC)
azara: (Default)
From: [personal profile] azara
I never saw that as the book's definition of honour - I thought it was presented as the (wrongheaded) Dalemark aristocrats' idea of honour.

This is such a cold, cold book! The children have been brought up in the belief that their parents' romantic elopement was the beginning of a happy-go-lucky life as nomadic bards. Then they find out that their father was a ruthless manipulator who coerced their mother into it, while their mother has been lying by omission when she backs him up out of her barren sense of duty. So their father did some really despicable things, while their mother's silence means they never really knew her. It's no wonder they feel like orphans.

It always struck me as a fairly savage look at quite how much damage a "let's stay together for the sake of the children" attitude can do if the children end up being fed a diet of lies.

On top of that is the emphasis on the way that idealistic freedom fighters can hurt so many innocent bystanders, which is also a theme in a couple of the other Dalemark books. So I always found it very uncomfortable reading.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78910
1112131415 1617
181920 21222324
2526 27 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 10:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios