lightreads (
lightreads) wrote2006-10-02 11:02 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Guards! Guards!, Men at Arms, and Feet of Clay by Terry Pratchett
This is the city of Ankh-Morpork on the Discworld, where the guards are men (until affirmative action, anyway), where the dwarves are men (though there must be women somewhere behind the beards), where you can walk the streets in safety (as long as you pay your annual fee to the thieves guild), and where solving crime can get a bit complicated (especially when you don’t just pick who-done-it ahead of time and send Detritus the troll after them about it until they confess in self-defense). Guards! Guards! is about the mysterious summoning of a dragon, Men at Arms is about affirmative action coming to the night watch (they hire a dwarf, a troll, and a woman), and Feet of Clay is a complex little knot about golems.
Okay, so, for anyone out of the loop, these are just a few out of an enormous parody series about the Discworld, which is, you know, a flat disk which rides through space on the backs of four elephants which in turn ride on the back of a turtle. Obviously. They poke a lot of mostly gentle fun at fantasy novels, while simultaneously being very good ones themselves. The trick of the humor is a sort of deadpan acceptance of the rules – of fantasy novels, of stories in general, and sometimes of our world. The books ask what it would really be like if the things we believe about how the world ought to work are actually true, and generally concludes that it would be pretty freaking ridiculous. There’s a great sequence in Guards! Guards! where a few characters are trying to kill a dragon with one shot from one lucky arrow. It’s a million-to-one chance, and so they of course know that it must work. But then they start worrying – what if it isn’t exactly a million-to-one? What if it’s only a thousand-to-one? Everyone knows that would never come through. They do think, however, that the odds of a bowman making the shot backwards while standing on one foot with a handkerchief in his mouth are just about right.
The thing about Pratchett is that he’s completely shameless. Most of the funny works because it’s delivered so straight-faced, but once in a while you just know he’s sniggering back there somewhere because you’ve just let him get away with a really freaking awful joke. From a footnote:
How can you not love that sort of cheek? Also this, just because:
Anyway. It’s riotously funny, but like really good humor, it’s because it’s set on deep foundations. The political and social commentary flies thick and fast, and even with all that, the characters simply shine. Well, except for the ones who don’t bathe.
Okay, so, for anyone out of the loop, these are just a few out of an enormous parody series about the Discworld, which is, you know, a flat disk which rides through space on the backs of four elephants which in turn ride on the back of a turtle. Obviously. They poke a lot of mostly gentle fun at fantasy novels, while simultaneously being very good ones themselves. The trick of the humor is a sort of deadpan acceptance of the rules – of fantasy novels, of stories in general, and sometimes of our world. The books ask what it would really be like if the things we believe about how the world ought to work are actually true, and generally concludes that it would be pretty freaking ridiculous. There’s a great sequence in Guards! Guards! where a few characters are trying to kill a dragon with one shot from one lucky arrow. It’s a million-to-one chance, and so they of course know that it must work. But then they start worrying – what if it isn’t exactly a million-to-one? What if it’s only a thousand-to-one? Everyone knows that would never come through. They do think, however, that the odds of a bowman making the shot backwards while standing on one foot with a handkerchief in his mouth are just about right.
The thing about Pratchett is that he’s completely shameless. Most of the funny works because it’s delivered so straight-faced, but once in a while you just know he’s sniggering back there somewhere because you’ve just let him get away with a really freaking awful joke. From a footnote:
Fingers-mazda, the first thief in the world, stole fire from the gods. But he was unable to fence it. It was too hot. He got really burned on that deal.
How can you not love that sort of cheek? Also this, just because:
The truth is that even big collections of ordinary books distort space, as can readily be proved by anyone who has been around a really old-fashioned secondhand bookshop, one of those that look as though it were designed by Escher on a bad day and has more staircases than stories and those rows of shelves which end in little doors that are surely too small for a full-sized human to enter. The relevant equation is knowledge=power=energy=matter=mass; a good bookshop is just a genteel black hole that knows how to read.
Anyway. It’s riotously funny, but like really good humor, it’s because it’s set on deep foundations. The political and social commentary flies thick and fast, and even with all that, the characters simply shine. Well, except for the ones who don’t bathe.
no subject
And the new Tiffany Aching book, the sequel to Hat Full of Sky, is finally out!
*happy sigh*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I thought of your last post on derivative fiction when I saw it. I've only read a few pages, but I thought it might make you happy. Makes me wonder if Neil G. reads slash...
no subject
I don't know about slash, though God knows it wouldn't surprise. I do know that he's definitely read fanfiction in general, not to mention written some -- there's a Matrix story he wrote which I'm pretty sure the studio actually posted and used as promotion. So not fanfiction in the underground community sense, but I know he's familiar with the concept.
Oh, who am I kidding -- he's totally read slash.
no subject
no subject
I'm reading the books thematically rather than chronologically -- guards stuff first, and then maybe back at the beginning for Rincewind. It's really letting me see how his style changes. A little less funny, a little sharper around the edges, a little more knotted up. Good and bad, though I've also been warned that some either later stuff is simply tired. Ah well, I'm sure there's a metaphor about a few soft apples in a great big bushel, or something.
no subject
I, uh, have the whole series, except for the brand spanking new one that just came out if you need any...
*is not a pusher*
Anyway. It’s riotously funny, but like really good humor, it’s because it’s set on deep foundations. The political and social commentary flies thick and fast, and even with all that, the characters simply shine. Well, except for the ones who don’t bathe.
Yes. Yes. And yes. Thank you for putting it so articulately.
no subject
I think I have most of them, though not Thud!. But it will be quite a while before I get there.
Ook
(Anonymous) 2006-10-03 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)I am thrilled that I helped with you trying them again, and if/when you need Thud, you know who to hit up. I'll bring it over with bells on.
Re: Ook
Re: Ook
And yeah, I'll hit you up. May just do that anyway -- haven't seen you in a while. *pout*.
Re: Ook
I'm not surprised Diplomatic Immunity left you cold-- it's the book that excites me the least in that series, although still sound and enjoyable in a larger context.
And yeah, I'll hit you up. May just do that anyway -- haven't seen you in a while. *pout*.
I know. It's a travesty that must be fixed! *is helpless before the power of the pout*
I will stop spamming your comments now, I promise!
Re: Ook
Re: Ook
no subject
I think you'll like the Death/Susan books when you get to them. Death is quite wonderful in the ways that he just doesn't *get* humanity, though he tries very hard. And they have the Death of Rats in them.
no subject
In fact, that does sound like something that will really appeal to me. *intrigued*