lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads ([personal profile] lightreads) wrote2019-10-31 12:06 pm

The Happiest Baby on the Block by Harvey Karp

The Happiest Baby on the Block

2/5. I hated this book, but have to admit I also consulted it several times over the past few weeks. It's intended for parents of colicky babies. Casterbrook is actually a pretty chill little dude (thank God, I was a nightmare baby, so we worried) but the advice here about what sort of noise and motion soothes babies is still occasionally helpful.

But lordy this book is obnoxious. He goes on about how various indigenous peoples (the word "primitives" gets used, for real) have ancient baby wisdom, and is simultaneously like "here's this 'new' science only I can impart to you." Hmm. That's just the tip of the obnoxious iceberg, but you get the idea. Oh, but also, why does your baby have to be the happiest? Why are we turning this into some neighborhood competition? Ugh. Also also, yes, the author of this book is that guy selling the $1300 "smart basinet," so … yeah.
thefourthvine: Two people fucking, rearview: sex is the universal fandom. (Default)

[personal profile] thefourthvine 2019-10-31 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
The best thing about this book for us was when a toddler earthling found it, became entranced by the cover, and slowly destroyed it. It’s not the most annoying parenting book on the market, but it’s in the top quartile.
Edited 2019-10-31 16:19 (UTC)
readerjane: Book Cat (Default)

[personal profile] readerjane 2019-10-31 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, yeah, I don't think authors get to tout something as new science while simultaneously supporting it with "ancient wisdom". Those historical patents were desperately trying anything to get the kids to go to sleep already, just like we tried.

The smart bassinet makes me think of the sleeping chair that Eve Dallas bought for Mavis. Mavis's was probably cooler, though.
Edited 2019-10-31 18:04 (UTC)
cahn: (Default)

[personal profile] cahn 2019-11-01 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup, this book was terrible because it was so awful and yet... also... sometimes useful, so I couldn't just get rid of it.