lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
lightreads ([personal profile] lightreads) wrote 2011-05-01 02:12 am (UTC)

...woops, no one saw that.

(If you understand how the two plot threads in this came together, please do explain, because I got nothing.

No, I don't either, aside from the fact that they were happening to the same guy. Not even a hint of thematic congruity. But I enjoyed both pieces enough that I stopped looking halfway through.

I was pretty happy that there _were_ complications and consequences in the sequel, and thought upon due consideration that they were handled well, but it's not an area that my antennae are always as good at as they should be, so I will be curious to see what you think.

Oh good. My concerns were that -- spoilers, obviously -- L would suddenly cease being a sexual presence, or be shuffled off stage completely. There is something really scary and delicate going on there. Someone said once that if you want to scare a man, threaten to cut his balls; if you want to frighten a woman, threaten to cut her face. Essentialist crap, but still, there's a little something to it. And I'm hoping the sequel doesn't bobble the whole thing, or fail to realize what it's carrying now.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting